Why gay marriage is an ASSet

California is having a hard time coming up with a viable plan for gays to unionize. At first, gay marriage was approved, now its suddenly been banned by rightous groups that want to keep marriage between man and a woman only. There is a surmountable room for debate on this subject, and here's my opinion.
Gays are going to have sex with or without the rightous groups permission, and it is to the advantage of civilization and yes, civil liberties, to rethink the status of marriage. To look back at ancient times and previous eras for support on this, is to turn your back on the future. Creating an environment against gays does not extinguish the fact that they exist, and they will keep doing "it" with or without big brother, and they will probably continue to create the hazardous conditions that created AIDs, by living the life of many partners. Since there is no future for gays to get married in some regions, does not make being a homosexual illegal, it just means they had better do "it" behind everybody's back, and NOT talk about it openly.
For some reason, heterosexual living feels intimidated by allowing some groups the same rights as theirs. The main concern here is of course, families and not having them. But who knows what gay people are able to accomplish if they are never given the chance to prove America wrong. I will bet you anything, if gay marriage was unionized worldwide, the chances of us working together would overcome the anxieties of trying to fight among ourselves. It just so happens, that gay people are extremely family orientated, and are open to doors of adoption and serogate offsprings. In the meantime, straights have completely exiled gays back into the leather bars with denying them a chance for a reasonable lifestyle. They have no alternative but to cruise, lust, and live the life they are condemned to live.
Of course there's the rightous groups who insist if they really want to change, they must really have to by changing who they are. This is not only unreasonable, but undoubtadly impossible. Ive tried to change myself, but found I had nothing to live for-because I could never be who I am. If this means living peacfully, lovingly, according to the laws of the state, and still being a homosexual, then this is all I can do, but its not enough. We need partners if life just like anybody else, and its not about changing the bible, but changing the way people think about allowing those who have been shunned for years, to become normal instead of typcast freaks. Yes, there is another love, and its out there. Denying these folks a way of life is denying civil rights to promising people who are ready to give as law abiding citizens. To each his own, that's my philosophy.